One of the things I will miss about my classes this summer are the crazy misunderstandings that come from our attempts at conversation (they always seem amplified when the conversation involves a child's perspective).
Example #1 comes from a homework question answered by a student who, although paying some attention in class, had obviously not read the assignment.
Homework Question: What was one practice of the Catholic Church that the Reformers objected to in the 15th and 16th Centuries?
Real Answer: "The selling of indulgences as a means of salvation."
Student's Answer: "The selling of old Jesuses to get to heaven."
I had to think of that one for a few minutes and read it out loud before I figured out that indulgence and old-Jesus really do kind of sound the same.
Example #2 is even better. It comes from a conversation I had with a student in class. I'll call her Alex.
Alex: "Ms Trim, do you like chocolate?"
Me: "Yes I do . . . but then, when you think about it, do you know very many women who don't like chocolate?!"
Alex: Ms Hill doesn't like chocolate.
Me: That's true. But Ms Hill only eats healthy things.
Alex: Some of the stuff she eats is DISGUSTING!!! Did you know she eats toads?!?!
Me: (thinking - she's a vegetarian) Toads? I don't think so. What do you mean?
Alex: Yeah she does! It's called toad . . . toad . . . toad-foo, I think.
Me: Not toad-foo, Alex. Tofu.
No comments:
Post a Comment